Christian Perrier wrote: > I've looked at scripts/testing-summary/annotations list, but I don't > really know whether I should add all the packages which had updates > after the variable substitution erros squashing party of Sunday Jan 30th. Well not until they are in the archive anyway, as that page does not track packages until then. > The list is H.U.G.E....and we may have hard times just building all > these packages. Let's see which ones are already branched in trunk vs which ones could be released from trunk to sarge.. I did some of the releases as I was going through the list. > arch/alpha/aboot-installer 0.0.19 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > arch/hppa/palo-installer 0.0.7 has some new changes from Colin, which I'd just as soon avoid in sarge due to lack of testing. Better to apply the translation fixes to the sarge branch and release that. > arch/i386/grub-installer 1.08 has some new changes from me, which only affect lvm 1 and which I'd just as soon avoid in sarge due to lack of testing. Better to apply the translations fixes to the sarge branch and release that. > arch/i386/lilo-installer 1.07 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > arch/ia64/elilo-installer 1.3 in unstable is probably safe though not really needed for rc3. 1.4 is unreleased and has more changes, which I'd just as soon avoid for sarge. Probably best to merge 1.3 to sarge branch and then apply the translations to there and release a 1.3.1. Or test the pending 1.4. > arch/mips/arcboot-installer Needs a release from trunk, will be ok for sarge. (ths uploading) > arch/mipsel/delo-installer Needs a release from trunk, will be ok for sarge. (ths or tbm uploading) > arch/s390/dasd 0.0.11 in trunk has template naming and other changes that I don't see a need to put in sarge. Better to apply the translation fixes to sarge branch and release that. > arch/s390/netdevice 0.0.8 ditto as s390-dasd. > arch/sparc/silo-installer 1.00 was just released and has changes I'm unsure of. We either need to get that tested until we're sure it's ok for sarge, or superscede it with an upload from the sarge branch with the translation fixes. > autopartkit 1.07 released from trunk, ok for sarge, assuming libparted changes get in. (1.06 had the libparted changes.) > base-installer Trunk is forked with post-sarge changes. Translation fixes should be applied to sarge branch and released. > cdebconf Trunk is forked with post-sarge changes. Translation fixes should be applied to sarge branch and released. > cdrom-checker 1.03 released from trunk, probably will be ok for sarge. > cdrom-detect 1.04 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > choose-mirror 1.05 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > ddetect 1.14 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > iso-scan 1.04 in trunk has a few changes, it might be better to apply the translation fixes to sarge branch and release that. > kbd-chooser 1.09 has usb change that I've not yet decided about for sarge. Doesn't help that it's not yet built on arm, i386, or mips, nearly a month after its upload. Unsure what to do. > localechooser post-sarge. > lvmcfg 1.06 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > mdcfg 1.09 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > netcfg 1.08 in trunk has several changes, untested. Better to apply translation fix to sarge branch and release from there. > network-console 0.0.11 includes a security fix and is oked for sarge. 0.0.12 in trunk has template name changes that I slighyly would prefer to avoid. Unsure what to do, possibly merge 0.0.11 to sarge branch, along with template fixes, and release from there. Or go with 0.0.12. > nobootloader 1.03 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partconf 1.06 is ok assuming parted abi change goes into sarge. (ths uploading) > partitioner 0.29 is ok assuming parted abi change goes into sarge. > partman/partman 62 is potentially ok, if parted abi change goes into sarge, and pending review of other changes in version 62 and 61. > partman/partman-basicfilesystems 38 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-basicmethods 26 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-efi 8 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-ext2r0 1.5 in trunk is ok for sarge. (tbm uploading) > partman/partman-ext3 35 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-jfs 12 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-lvm 30 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-md 20 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-partitioning 33 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-prep Post sarge, I think. > partman/partman-reiserfs 25 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-target 34 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > partman/partman-xfs 24 released from trunk, ok for sarge. > prebaseconfig Has a new code change in trunk, don't know if this will make sarge or not; if not the translations should be applied to sarge branch and a release done from there. > preseed Branched for sarge; translations need to be updated in sarge branch and a release done from there. > rescue Not in sarge. > retriever/floppy 1.05 released from trunk, ok for sarge. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature