Bug#262188: marked as done (silo-installer must call apt-install silo)
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:18:14 -0500
with message-id <E1CvsIg-0005eV-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#262188: fixed in silo-installer 1.00
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 01:52:25 +0000
>From vorlon@debian.org Thu Jul 29 18:52:24 2004
Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) [66.93.39.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BqMZM-0002sM-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:52:24 -0700
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BFF023C05; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:52:20 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: silo-installer must call apt-install silo
Message-ID: <20040730015220.GL6760@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: silo-installer
Version: 0.0.6
Severity: important
As discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff.,
debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader
packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update
silo-installer to call "apt-install silo" so that this package can be
removed from debootstrap's base list.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBCanUKN6ufymYLloRAkVWAJ9PRdI3Zv81Df1qemLnNlCpfLVVnACgiMns
XVl35Yl3C+fquUBZDtVdbYI=
=nflo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 262188-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2005 07:23:19 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon Jan 31 23:23:19 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CvsNb-0003FO-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:23:19 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CvsIg-0005eV-00; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:18:14 -0500
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
To: 262188-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#262188: fixed in silo-installer 1.00
Message-Id: <E1CvsIg-0005eV-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:18:14 -0500
Delivered-To: 262188-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: silo-installer
Source-Version: 1.00
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
silo-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
silo-installer_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.00.dsc
silo-installer_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.00.tar.gz
silo-installer_1.00_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.00_sparc.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 262188@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org> (supplier of updated silo-installer package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:53:46 -0800
Source: silo-installer
Binary: silo-installer
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1.00
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Description:
silo-installer - install silo on a hard disk (udeb)
Closes: 262188 283062
Changes:
silo-installer (1.00) unstable; urgency=HIGH
.
* Joshua Kwan
- Yeesh. Build the package in binary-arch, not binary-indep.
- [ -n "$bootfs" ] instead of [ "$bootfs" ].
- Remove isinstallable and take care of apt-installing silo in
the postinst, since debootstrap no longer takes care of this.
(Closes: #262188)
- Install initrd stanzas for vmlinuz and vmlinuz.old. (closes: #283062)
Files:
0baffc8ed7e555fcf173aec264654d0c 1336 debian-installer standard silo-installer_1.00.dsc
c59e56441896d5c00311a6798bd66837 47854 debian-installer standard silo-installer_1.00.tar.gz
4f31d766a4491082bc98e3c1a7956f22 35732 debian-installer standard silo-installer_1.00_sparc.udeb
package-type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=1yAx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: