Bug#248104: Processed: Re: Bug#248104: Partman report "10 partman/filesystem_long/hfs+ doesn't exist."
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:03:07AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for email@example.com:
> > reassign 248104 partman-newworld
> Bug#248104: Partman report "10 partman/filesystem_long/hfs+ doesn't exist."
> Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `partman-newworld'.
Any reason why partman-newworld in particular? They share an
architecture, true, but HFS+ partitions don't have a lot to do with
newworld boot partitions.
I was thinking more partman-basicfilesystems myself.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]