Bug#235923: marked as done (Autopartitioning the whole disk always creates msdos partition table)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500
with message-id <E1AzK7L-0000pR-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#235923: fixed in partman-auto 8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 07:52:11 +0000
>From anton@lml.bas.bg Tue Mar 02 23:52:11 2004
Return-path: <anton@lml.bas.bg>
Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AyRAp-0003qx-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:52:11 -0800
Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AyRFg-0006YQ-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:57:12 +0200
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:57:12 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Autopartitioning the whole disk always creates msdos partition table
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040303075711.GD23174@lml.bas.bg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: partman-auto
Severity: important
When the user requests autopartitioning of the whole drive,
partman-auto creates msdos partition table even on non-i386
architectures. Instead it had to discover the default partition table
type for the architecture.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235923-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 18:38:05 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Mar 05 10:38:05 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzKCz-0001VK-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:38:05 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzK7L-0000pR-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 235923-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#235923: fixed in partman-auto 8
Message-Id: <E1AzK7L-0000pR-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:32:15 -0500
Delivered-To: 235923-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 8
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
partman-auto_8.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.dsc
partman-auto_8.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8.tar.gz
partman-auto_8_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_8_all.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 235923@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> (supplier of updated partman-auto package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:17:48 -0900
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source all
Version: 8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description:
partman-auto - Automatically partition storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 235923 235964
Changes:
partman-auto (8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Anton Zinoviev
- automatically_partition/some_device/do_option: creates new partition
table with the default for the architecture type. Closes: #235923
- perform_recipe: start progress bar, as autopartitioning can be quiet
slow
* Joey Hess
- add xfs and reiserfs to the valid fs list (should this use info from the
plugins?)
- if there is no valid recipe, bail with an error instead of hanging.
Closes: #235964
* Updated translations:
- Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis
- Finnish (fi.po) by Tapio Lehtonen
- French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
- Hungarian (hu.po) by VER�K István
- Italian (it.po) by Stefano Canepa
- Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
- Lithuanian (lt.po) by KÄ?stutis BiliÅ«nas
- (nn.po) by HÃ¥vard Korsvoll
- Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
- Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André LuÃs Lopes
- Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
- Simplified Chinese (zh_CN.po) by Carlos Z.F. Liu
(Erm, so the automated script says, but I don't think all these really
changed -- JEH)
Files:
855c3624ab1b42671f6045e351426307 623 debian-installer standard partman-auto_8.dsc
89c6a1f706c77d9f9c4f17bbd455fdf2 33033 debian-installer standard partman-auto_8.tar.gz
dd9cff9e84e03b49baeb265fdf7800d8 20356 debian-installer standard partman-auto_8_all.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFASMVc2tp5zXiKP0wRAglmAKCXXI8r/ni94gHGZ8eCyoz3C0XL9wCdErZt
bVxJfCaAwekCe1P+G665e4w=
=Wb9U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: