Bug#231514: linux-kernel-di: prefix is the wrong word for -di
Tags: sid patch
Rather than calling -di a postfix, I reworded the sentence.
--- README~ 2003-10-29 08:21:01.000000000 -0800
+++ README 2004-02-06 19:38:44.000000000 -0800
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@
the udebs. It also generates one udeb with only the kernel in it.
The udebs to be generated are listed in the package-lists file. The
-kernel-versions file contains information about what versions kernel(s) to
-use for each architecture. The gen-control program takes these two files
-plus debian/control.stub and generates debian/control. The udebs are named
-with the version of the kernel in their package name, since that can be
-useful during kernel transitions. The -di prefix is used to prevent any
-posible collisions in names with real debs.
+kernel-versions file contains information about what versions
+kernel(s) to use for each architecture. The gen-control program takes
+these two files plus debian/control.stub and generates
+debian/control. The udebs are named with the version of the kernel in
+their package name, since that can be useful during kernel
+transitions. The string -di is appended to prevent any posible
+collisions in names with real debs.
The modules to put in each udeb are listed in the files in the
modules/<arch> directory (if modules/<arch>-<flavour> exists, it is used
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C