[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#231073: marked as done (install report on an amd k6/2 350mhz)



Your message dated Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:07:36 +0100
with message-id <20040204160736.GC671@mykerinos>
and subject line Bug#231073: install report on an amd k6/2 350mhz
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2004 11:44:51 +0000
>From filippogiunchedi@esaurito.net Wed Feb 04 03:44:51 2004
Return-path: <filippogiunchedi@esaurito.net>
Received: from aphelion.hi-net.it (aphelion.it) [195.120.109.25] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AoLSd-0004rV-00; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 03:44:51 -0800
Received: (qmail 7061 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 11:44:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO esaurito.net) (195.120.109.25)
  by aphelion.hi-net.it with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 11:44:47 -0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 685 invoked by uid 501);
	Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:21:14 -0000
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:21:14 +0100
From: Filippo Giunchedi <filippo@esaurito.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: install report on an amd k6/2 350mhz
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040203232114.GB477@hattori.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: undef
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
	HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 


--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 03-02-2004 i386 netinst
uname -a: not available, 2.4.22-1-386 installed
Date: Wed Feb  4 00:08:06 CET 2004 =20
Method: boot from cdrom=20

Machine: custom PC=20
Processor: amd k6/2 350mhz=20
Memory: 256mb=20
Root Device: hda: wester digital 4,2gb
Root Size/partition table: hda2 1gb=20
Output of lspci: not available but i saved /var/log/debian-installer/

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]=20
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]=20
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E] see below
Reboot:                 [O]=20
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

all went fine, none of the udebs failed and the priority didn't get lowered,
which is good.

however, grub-installer did NOT ask me if I want to install the boot loader,
overwriting mine, which is NOT good. To me, this is not the good default
behaviour for the general user. at least asking would be good (okay, for the
random user this might be confusing, then defaulting to "yes" should be ok)=
=2E I
know this issue has already been raised, anyhow at least a backup of the MBR
should be done and document it somewhere.

thanks for the great debian-installer!

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi=20
GNU/PG key: 6B79D401
Random signature below:

I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go
into the other room and read a book.
-- Groucho Marx

--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFAICzqABzeamt51AERAkVeAJ9bL8DphteWyLOIE6HR+SDeqNZgJwCdHR63
287LEdXOgTBLyHAupwEIBJo=
=WwVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231073-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2004 16:07:41 +0000
>From christian.perrier@onera.fr Wed Feb 04 08:07:40 2004
Return-path: <christian.perrier@onera.fr>
Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AoPYy-0005lI-00; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 08:07:40 -0800
Received: from mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id i14G7cnV005581;
        Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:07:38 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [127.0.0.1])
	by mykerinos.onera (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 51263D066; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 17:07:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mykerinos.onera ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 04721-05; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:07:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id D0B47D05D; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 17:07:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:07:36 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Filippo Giunchedi <filippo@esaurito.net>, 231073-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#231073: install report on an amd k6/2 350mhz
Message-ID: <20040204160736.GC671@mykerinos>
References: <[🔎] 20040203232114.GB477@hattori.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040203232114.GB477@hattori.local>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at mykerinos
Delivered-To: 231073-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

clone 231073 -1
reassign -1 debian-installer
merge 230502 -1
thanks

Thank you for your installation report.

The only problem you report is about the boot loader.


This problem has been reported differently under #229212 #230502 and
#229371. All these belong to the same field (making boot loader
installation more secure and more versatile). Thus, I clone this bug,
assign it to debian-installer and merge it with 230502.

Also note that a "nobootloader" package now exists in d-i for handling
cases where the user does not want any bootloader to be installed.

With these consideration, I think we can close this installation
report. Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Quoting Filippo Giunchedi (filippo@esaurito.net):
> Package: installation-reports
> 
> INSTALL REPORT
> 
> Debian-installer-version: 03-02-2004 i386 netinst
> uname -a: not available, 2.4.22-1-386 installed
> Date: Wed Feb  4 00:08:06 CET 2004  
> Method: boot from cdrom 
> 
> Machine: custom PC 
> Processor: amd k6/2 350mhz 
> Memory: 256mb 
> Root Device: hda: wester digital 4,2gb
> Root Size/partition table: hda2 1gb 
> Output of lspci: not available but i saved /var/log/debian-installer/
> 
> Base System Installation Checklist:
> 
> Initial boot worked:    [O]
> Configure network HW:   [O]
> Config network:         [O]
> Detect CD:              [O]
> Load installer modules: [O] 
> Detect hard drives:     [O]
> Partition hard drives:  [O] 
> Create file systems:    [O]
> Mount partitions:       [O]
> Install base system:    [O]
> Install boot loader:    [E] see below
> Reboot:                 [O] 
> [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
> 
> Comments/Problems:
> 
> all went fine, none of the udebs failed and the priority didn't get lowered,
> which is good.
> 
> however, grub-installer did NOT ask me if I want to install the boot loader,
> overwriting mine, which is NOT good. To me, this is not the good default
> behaviour for the general user. at least asking would be good (okay, for the
> random user this might be confusing, then defaulting to "yes" should be ok). I
> know this issue has already been raised, anyhow at least a backup of the MBR
> should be done and document it somewhere.
> 
> thanks for the great debian-installer!
> 
> filippo
> --
> Filippo Giunchedi 
> GNU/PG key: 6B79D401
> Random signature below:
> 
> I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go
> into the other room and read a book.
> -- Groucho Marx



-- 




Reply to: