Bug#186594: why is #186594 assigned to netcfg?

To: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@soziologie.ch>
Cc: 186594@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#186594: why is #186594 assigned to netcfg?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:53:38 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031224005338.A25606@saruman.uio.no>
Reply-to: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, 186594@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1072221544.963.16.camel@tigerente>; from gaudenz@soziologie.ch on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 12:19:04AM +0100
References: <[🔎] 1072221544.963.16.camel@tigerente>

[Gaudenz Steinlin]
> Hi pere
> 
> Why did you assign #186594 to netcfg? IMHO it should be closed or
> reassigned to boot-floppies.

Hm, no idea.  Must have seen like a good idea there and then. :)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#186594: why is #186594 assigned to netcfg?
  - From: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@soziologie.ch>

Prev by Date: Should we really use countries in languagechooser (was: Re: BIDI Status in Debina Installer)
Next by Date: Re: font reduction build problem
Previous by thread: Bug#186594: why is #186594 assigned to netcfg?
Next by thread: font reduction build problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread