Geert Stappers wrote: > Using a branch for freeze and HEAD for HEAD, sounds very reasonable to me. > I even like "sarge" as a name for the branch. Not to me. It's adding a roadblock in front of anyone who wants to work on the sarge release of the installer, and making things easier for anyone who wants to do work that will *not* help the sarge release of the installer. At the moment I prefer to invert that, encouraging work on the sarge version of the installer, discouraging accidental commits to the wrong branch by casual committers (think translators) and not going out of the way to make things easier for changes that will not benefit sarge. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature