Thiemo Seufer wrote: > This can never work. It would effectively mean to stop further development > of d-i over the lifetime of sarge, since there has to be a "critical fixes > only" source tree for the stable release. > > I strongly recommend to create a "sarge" branch. This leaves HEAD unimpeded > and allows stricter control over the release branch. Otherwise you'll have > to scare off your co-developers all the time from doing what they like > most: Implementing shiny new features. Shiny features can go in a shiney features branch. There is no need at all for that branch to be HEAD. Anyway, the freeze is only here to prevent changes to core components that can break everything else. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature