[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#191636: fix to this bug.



On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 14:57, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include <hallo.h>
> * Alastair McKinstry [Sun, Jul 27 2003, 02:26:46PM]:
> > As the maintainer of whiptail, I was not aware of this bug, which was
> > filed against modconf. In the current newt package, whiptail and
> > whiptail-utf8 were merged; modconf seems to work fine for me now.
> > 
> > (There are some minor graphical issues in utf-8 mode, due to an error in
> > slang,  for which a patch as been submitted; see eg. 195010).
> > 
> > Could you please retest modconf against the latest whiptail, 0.51.4-8;
> > and if either confirm the bug or close it?
> 
> Still broken. With LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, semi-graphical chars are not displayed correctly, example attached.
> 
> > Incidentally, there appear to be a large number of bugs filed against
> > slang / slang-utf8 that I believe to be fixed by recent uploads. I may
> > help go through those and close some.
> 
> The bug report that Junichi requested is:
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=201767
> 

Ok, I believe the problems reported in this bug report are fixed by the
patch recently submitted for slang1.

I think I missed the beginning of this thread, but I was commenting on
bug 191636, which I believe should be closed (as in, no _grave_ problems
exist in whiptail). If not, I'd like to know.

Thanks,
Alastair

> MfG,
> Eduard.
> -- 
> <weasel> nobse: du kannst gerne http://wwwbrauer.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/
> 	praktikum/verifikation/WS2001-2002/p244-clarke.pdf fuer mich
> 	durcharbeiten, wenn dir langweilig ist
> <nobse> weasel: iieh, ein pdf
> <GNU> nobse soll ich es dir nach DOC konvertieren?
-- 
Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.

- --Thomas Paine




Reply to: