Bug#201780: marked as done (install: build fails due to segfault of bdftobogl)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:42:19 +0200
with message-id <20030718114219.28592.qmail@mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
and subject line My fault...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 20:24:25 +0000
>From sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de Thu Jul 17 15:23:11 2003
Return-path: <sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.131]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dFHT-0000PV-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:23:11 -0500
Received: from ms-2 (ms-dienst.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.132])
by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003))
with ESMTP id <0HI600GCOR3RZJ@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for
submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:19:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from relay.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.1])
by ms-2 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:19:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de
(mx.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.118.4]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de
(8.12.9/8.12.7-1) with SMTP id h6HKJ2NY023117 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:19:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 8065 invoked by alias); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:19:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 8053 invoked from network); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:19:02 +0000
Received: from coyote.mmweg (HELO coyote) (sebastian@134.130.118.117)
by hub.mmweg with SMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:19:02 +0000
Received: by coyote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:19:02 +0200
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:19:02 +0200
From: Sebastian Ley <sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: install: build fails due to segfault of bdftobogl
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030717221902.8062.qmail@mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: install
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-17
Severity: normal
A make build fails here on i386 with:
---------8<-----------
# Need to use an UTF-8 based locale to get reduce-font working.
# Any will do. en_IN seem fine and was used by boot-floppies
# reduce-font is part of package libbogl-dev
# unifont.bdf is part of package bf-utf-source
# The locale must be generated after installing the package locales
LC_ALL=en_IN.UTF-8 reduce-font /usr/src/unifont.bdf < all-cdrom.utf >
unifont-reduced-cdrom.bdf
setlocale: en_IN.UTF-8
FYI: MB_CUR_MAX/MB_LEN_MAX: 6/16
/usr/src/unifont.bdf: No such file or directory
# bdftobogl is part of package libbogl-dev
bdftobogl -b unifont-reduced-cdrom.bdf > tmp/cdrom/tree/unifont.bgf
make: *** [tmp/cdrom/tree/unifont.bgf] Fehler 139
--------->8------------
Running the offending line manually shows that bdftobogl segfaults. I
don't know if bdftobogl is broken, or perhaps the inputfile is
malformed. Assigned the package to installer for investigation by people
who are familiar with that stuff.
Severity is set to normal, because a second run of make build succeeds.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux coyote 2.4.20 #1 Fri Jun 13 19:12:09 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201780-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2003 09:52:21 +0000
>From sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de Fri Jul 18 04:52:14 2003
Return-path: <sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.131]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dRuN-0004J8-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 04:52:11 -0500
Received: from ms-2 (ms-dienst.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.132])
by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003))
with ESMTP id <0HI700CYSSAQ6V@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for
201780-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:42:26 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from relay.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.1])
by ms-2 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:42:25 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de
(mx.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.118.4]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de
(8.12.9/8.12.7-1) with SMTP id h6I9gKNY022878 for
<201780-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:42:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 28596 invoked by alias); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:20 +0000
Received: (qmail 28579 invoked from network); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:19 +0000
Received: from coyote.mmweg (HELO coyote) (sebastian@134.130.118.117)
by hub.mmweg with SMTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:42:19 +0000
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:42:19 +0200
From: Sebastian Ley <sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: My fault...
To: 201784-done@bugs.debian.org, 201780-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-id: <20030718114219.28592.qmail@mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: 201780-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This was a local problem. I had some conflicts during cvs update
leaving my control file unchanged.
With all builddeps installed I do not encounter these two bugs.
Reply to: