[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Building boot images with boot-floppies on PowerMac



On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:55:48AM +0800, debian@computerdatasafe.com.au wrote:
> > I have done these things:
> >   apt-get source boot-floppies
> >   cd ..
> >  vim config 
> > # to change mirror, local directories., maybe one to two other things
> > # Having alread had troubles like this, I left the kernel selections
> > # well alone.
> >   make check # OK
> >   time make release
> > 
> > It failed thus:
> > I: Validating
> > /archive/debian/download/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_woody_Release
> > I: Validating
> > /archive/debian/download/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_woody_main_binary-powerpc_Packages
> > E: Couldn't download pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-newpmac
> > E: ./kernel.sh abort
> > make[1]: *** [linuxnewpmac.bin] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/boot-floppies/boot-floppies-3.0.22'
> > make: *** [build] Error 2
> > 
> > real    23m35.152s
> > user    12m16.050s
> > sys     5m0.340s
> > Kultarr:~/boot-floppies/boot-floppies-3.0.22#
> 
> I see you have 3.0.22, which IIRC had this bug. Try getting 3.0.23
> (from unstable), or better yet do a cvs checkout from
> cvs.debian.org/boot-floppies, which has 3.0.24-almost.

I did that after my initial report. It fails thus:
./kernel.sh /archive/debian/download 2.4.18 newpmac
I: downloading kernel-image-2.4.18-newpmac
I: downloading PCMCIA module package, 'pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-newpmac'
I: Validating
/archive/debian/download/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_woody_Release
I: Validating
/archive/debian/download/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_woody_main_binary-powerpc_Packages
E: Couldn't download pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-newpmac
E: ./kernel.sh abort
make[1]: *** [linuxnewpmac.bin] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/cvs/bf/boot-floppies'
make: *** [build] Error 2

real    26m26.481s
user    12m18.430s
sys     4m58.800s
Kultarr:~/cvs/bf/boot-floppies#

 
> Stable still has 3.0.22. Is there a reason 3.0.23 never moved to
> stable, Eduard?

What should be in stable is working tools that may be used to create the
binaries created;-) How else can uses enjoy their GPL-given rights?

 
 

-- 

Cheers
John Summerfield

Please, no off-list mail at all at all. This address accepts mail only
from Debian addresses.




Reply to: