Re: Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2003 14:24:55 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 2fl8yx5l848.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87wukpl92h.fsf@lexx.delysid.org>
References: <[🔎] E18XnnL-0006DE-00@minerva.intern> <[🔎] 87y95purf3.fsf@lexx.delysid.org> <[🔎] 2fllm1prr4e.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 87wukpl92h.fsf@lexx.delysid.org>

[Mario Lang]
> Oh, sorry.  Of course.  And base-installer already depends on
> mounted-partition.

OK.  Do you fix it yourself or report it to BTS?

Reply to:

References:
- Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?
  - From: Mario Lang <mlang@debian.org>
- Re: Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?
  - From: Mario Lang <mlang@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#178615: rootskel: Package should not be platform-dependent
Next by Date: Bug#178612: marked as done (rootskel: Package contains CVS backup files)
Previous by thread: Re: Why is mounted-partitions required by debootstrap-udeb?
Next by thread: [d-i] Choosing the install kernel?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread