[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cdebconf state

Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> immo vero scripsit:

> > Well, it works. :) So, I'd rather not change it again.  Also, I
> > don't know the binary-tree stuff in glibc.  I kinda know this hash
> > library by now.
> Using glibc functions would reduce the size of cdebconf, wouldn't it?

It depends. Using new symbol from glibc might increased the 
size of libc after lib-reduction.


dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/

Reply to: