Re: busybox wget
Erik Andersen wrote:
> Looks like tausq has already fixed the other bugs before I
> even saw that there was a problem (thanks Randolph!).
>
> For the chunked issue, the thing is that we are not using busybox wget to visit
> slashdot, but rather we will be using it to pull down files. Files don't
> experience chunked transfer encoding, since there is only one chunk (unlike
> slashdot). So I think a much better test of what is or is not a killer is to
> grab files from a debian archive...
Hm, I was just assuming that since I saw it on slashdot and one other
site (I think it was my home web site), that it was fairly prevelant.
But I don't know what chunked encoding even is, if it's not going to
affect us, then fine. :-)
> One thing you missed, which is critical, is proxy support...
Eep yes!
Can you make a new udeb out of cvs?
--
see shy jo
Reply to: