[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Priorities



On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:34:54AM -0400, Robert Funnell wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> 
> > ...
> > 	Task packages can define different levels of installation. The
> > 	tasksel program will follow these rules for each case:
> > 
> > 	- Minimum, installs everything that the task-* package Depends on
> > 	- Standard, installs everything in Minimum, plus packages that it
> > 	  Recommends
> > 	- Complete, installs all of the above plus packages that it
> > 	  Suggests
> > ...
> 
> I've seen at least one package (I forget which) that recommended or
> suggested alternate packages, from which one would normally choose one
> only. Perhaps they could even be mutually incompatible. How would your
> model handle this?

I don't see how that is supposed to work. We have this syntax for such
things:

Depends: foo | bar | crap

If things are really that similar and can replace each other, chances are
there is a virtual package for it, or there should be. That also handles
the case.

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'



Reply to: