RFC: ITP(?) busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate packages
Please give me your advice if packaging busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate
packages is a good idea or not. Thanks!
This comes to my mind because:
1) Seems boot-floppies won't like to come into woody (c.f. Adam)
2) Packages like mkinitrd-cd depends on boot-floppies solely for these two
If it's a good idea ;-) I'd like to package 'em but I will need some further
help! ;-) I'm currently in NM queue, I suppose. ;-)