Re: Boot-floppies: Why depends on "cslatex", "cspsfonts"
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 03:19:53PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:07:24AM +0200 , Otto Wyss wrote:
> > > > or suggests, if not removed at all?
> > >
> > > Probably recommends for the documentation "depends" should be enough, no?
> Why? Documentation building properly is not considered important?
> > > > How about all the other rather large list of packages?
> > >
> > > maybe tetex-*, but the others should stay
> > Should language specific stuff, like plateform specific stuff right now, not
> > be handled in the make depend part of the boot floppies, and not trully be
> > dependencies ?
Don't know just an idea like that, or maybe do you not consider compiling on
non i386 plateforms as important ? :))))