[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: boot-floppies 2.2.9 report



On Sun 02 Apr 2000, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Paul Slootman <paul@wau.mis.ah.nl> writes:
> 
> > I burnt a cdrom with boot-floppies 2.2.9 yesterday, and tested it just
> > now. Results so far:
> 
> Please tell us what architecture you are using.  I assume i386, since
> most of the ports seemed to need 2.2.10.

Oops, yes, i386.

> > - When rebooting the first time from disk, all the pcmcia modules had
> >   unresolved symbols.
> 
> File a bug on the pcmcia-modules-* pkg you were using.  This depends
> on which flavor you were using.

I wasn't using *any* pcmcia-modules-* pkg.  This was right after the
first time reboot (i.e. after base2_2.tgz is installed and nothing
more).

> > - When asked what access method to use (cdrom / http / ftp / manual
> >   edit) I chose cdrom, and was subsequently prompted for the name of the
> >   cdrom. The example was something like "Debian 2.1r4 cdrom 1", which is
> >   (a) a wrong example to give as most end users will copy that, and
> >   (b) not what the volume label is, which is reasonably easy to find out:
> >         LABEL=`dd if=/dev/cdrom bs=1 skip=32808 count=32 | tr`
> >       will do nicely.  I believe there's a specific tool for this
> >       somewhere, but can't recall its name just now.
> 
> Um.  At what stage does this occur?  Looks like you should file a bug
> against base-config I guess.

I'll take more notes next time I get a chance... Maybe this weekend.

> > - After the procedure scans the "index" files (I guess the Packages
> >   files), it came back to the question of what access method to use
> >   (cdrom / http / ftp / manual edit). By choosing "manual edit" and then
> >   quitting ae it went onto the next phase.
> 
> This sounds like a nasty base-config problem.

Ditto.

[...]
> File a wishlist against tasksel.
> 
> Really, it's only by filing bugs (one problem per bug please) that you
> can be sure your reports will be (eventually) taken care of.

OK, done for a couple; although I wouldn't have guessed that the last
one should belong to tasksel (didn't even know there was such a package
:-)


Paul Slootman
-- 
home:       paul@wurtel.demon.nl http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/
work:       paul@murphy.nl       http://www.murphy.nl/
debian:     paul@debian.org      http://www.debian.org/
isdn4linux: paul@isdn4linux.de   http://www.isdn4linux.de/


Reply to: