Re: [CVS] `br_woody_exp' created, I'm a GNU rewrite the Makefiles.
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 07:22:20PM -0800, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> Michael> Hmm... I have a question for you. :) I thought that branches are for
> Michael> supporting old versions... While trunk is for "bleeding edge" stuff.
> Michael> I'd say that if you want to start to work on woody's boot floppies,
> Michael> you'd better create a branch for *potato*.
>
> Michael> What do you think?
>
> Read what I wrote again, please.
I did. :) Maybe I was not clear enough. :) To my mind, any *woody* branches
should appear only after woody is released. Just having a
something-woody-something branch may be a bit confusing. I had a rather
*ideological* question. Time to time, names do matter, and I believe this is
the case here. If you had certain ideas behind creating a new branch (like
what we see in subject line), IMHO, it were better to name the branch something
like makefile_rewriting. :)
--
Mike
Reply to: