On 29/10/20 2:19 pm, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote: > On 29/10/20 2:03 pm, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:58:27PM +0100, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: >>> The new QA pages are super great, thank you! >> >> Definitely. >> >>> One small request, could you include a 🙂 along with the number of packages >>> that didn't have an issue? >> >> While I think that might be somehow "motivating" I'd prefer that this >> page should be a plain "todo" list. It simply would end in more >> scrolling if we would "bloat" it with packages that have no issues. >> Moreover the SQL query does not return those packages. > > I believe the request is just to show the _number_ of packages that have > no issues and not show the packages themselves. This would add a single > number to the summary section. > > If we wish to show such a number, we can do it along with the score > computation where the current WHERE clause will change into a score > computing expression. A score of zero will be assigned to packages with > issues. Packages with score zero will not be shown but will be counted > towards a separate total. > I have implemented calculating and sorting by score for QA pages [1]. The merge request was likely not noticed. So, this is a ping :) Links: 1) https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/website/-/merge_requests/11 -- Sunil
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature