Hi Andreas, On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:23:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > However, I would not make this a preference since I noticed that the > code becomes quite hard to read that way and I would prefer clean code > over this feature. The rationale behind this is that it might turn out > to be a misfeature from a taktical point of view since it allows this > team to play in their own playground rather than using and enhancing > Blends tools directly. ;-) If you want RDF information to appear at rdf.debian.net about blends, I would suggest playing nice and providing this JSON file. That sounds like it would be really useful. When I come to finishing off the blends websites, it would probably also be useful for tying the websites into the sentinels so that I don't have to do the manual listing of tasks. Thanks, Iain. -- e: irl@fsfe.org w: iain.learmonth.me x: irl@jabber.fsfe.org t: EPVPN 2105 c: 2M0STB g: IO87we p: 1F72 607C 5FF2 CCD5 3F01 600D 56FF 9EA4 E984 6C49
Attachment:
pgpRTrGkBqgd_.pgp
Description: PGP signature