[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@lsc.nd.edu>] Re: LAM: MPE support in lam?


"Eray Ozkural (exa)" <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> writes:

> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > MPE is included in mpich.
> > It is actually hidden somewhere in /usr/lib/mpich/, but maybe I'll go
> > and dig out some symlinks ...
> > 
> > However, it won't really make sense to separate it out into its own
> > package, since the version compiled against lam and mpich won't be compatible ?
> We could patch it into lam tree, then. Is that possible?

I haven't yet looked at mpe or lam6.3.3beta, but I take it from the
note from Jeff Squyres that I included that lam should work with
recent mpe as a *separate* library.  Unlike romio and c++ bindings,
they don't intend to patch it into the tree.  How this works, I do not
yet know.

Take care,

> Thanks,
> -- 
> Eray (exa) Ozkural
> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
> e-mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Camm Maguire			     			camm@enhanced.com
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah

Reply to: