Re: ell_0.49-1~bpo11+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 12:31:26 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I don't understand why the below rejection happened. Can some of you
> help clue me in?
>
> > ell_0.49.orig.tar.xz: Does not match file already existing in the pool.
I'm not a ftp team member, but I think this is correct:
It looks like you have uploaded two different versions of
ell_0.49.orig.tar.xz at some point in time, which the archive does not
allow. Please use the same byte-sequence as the ell_0.49.orig.tar.xz
that was already uploaded to unstable, and consider using pristine-tar
or pristine-lfs to guard against future mistakes.
> The package is newly introduced to bullseye-backports, so I built with
> -sa and uploaded with source included.
You don't need to do that: bullseye-backports is in the same instance of
dak as unstable (the one that writes to ftp-master.debian.org), so
re-uploading .orig source is unnecessary.
(Contrast with bullseye-security, which runs from a separate instance of
dak, security-master.debian.org, so that the security team can do their
embargo procedure - which means you *do* need -sa for -security uploads.)
smcv
Reply to: