Re: Accepted flatpak 1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports

To: debian-backports-changes@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Accepted flatpak 1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports
From: dulev <dulev@lugons.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:16:00 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20211015111600.3d81810b@dulev.pro-ing.rs>
In-reply-to: <E1mbIsJ-0007YN-Hs@fasolo.debian.org>
References: <E1mbIsJ-0007YN-Hs@fasolo.debian.org>

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:47:35 +0000, Debian FTP Masters
<ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> Version: 1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1
> Distribution: buster-backports
> ...
> ...
>  flatpak (1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * Rebuild for buster-backports.

Whether this is correct?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Accepted flatpak 1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports
  - From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: tomcat9 in buster-backports vs. security
Next by Date: Re: Accepted flatpak 1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports
Previous by thread: Re: RM: calibre/buster-backports -- ROM; no security support; bpo10s of a newer version are impossible
Next by thread: Re: Accepted flatpak 1.10.3-0+deb11u1~bpo11+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread