debian-backports Feb 2021 by date

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Feb 02

• OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Adrian Bunk

Feb 04

• Re: Bug#974684: Incorrect dependency in python3-lxml Adrian Bunk

Feb 05

• RFS: lutris/0.5.8.3-1~bpo10+1 for buster-backports NEW Phil Morrell

Feb 06

• Re: RFS: lutris/0.5.8.3-1~bpo10+1 for buster-backports NEW Boyuan Yang
• Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg
• Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Thorsten Glaser

Feb 07

• Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Emmanuel Bourg
• Re: OpenJDK 17 for bullseye-backports Matthias Klose
• Supporting RT5 in backports requires binary packages only in backports Dominic Hargreaves

Feb 08

• Re: Supporting RT5 in backports requires binary packages only in backports Alexander Wirt

Feb 10

• Upcoming: Backports for file, clevis+tang, possibly gnupg2 Christoph Biedl
• Package evolution-ews can't be installed from buster-backports pirx67

Feb 11

• Re: Package evolution-ews can't be installed from buster-backports Andrei POPESCU
• node-less 3.13.0+dfsg-1~bpo10+1 broke co-instability with uglifyjs Guilhem Moulin
• Aw: Re: Package evolution-ews can't be installed from buster-backports pirx67
• Emacs 1:27.1+1-3~bpo10+1 - Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Domenico Cufalo
• Re: Emacs 1:27.1+1-3~bpo10+1 - Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) John Goerzen
• Please add the Kernel 5.10 on Backports phil995511 -
• Re: Please add the Kernel 5.10 on Backports Boyan Penkov
• Re: node-less 3.13.0+dfsg-1~bpo10+1 broke co-instability with uglifyjs Yadd
• Re: Please add the Kernel 5.10 on Backports Rodrigo Campos
• Re: node-less 3.13.0+dfsg-1~bpo10+1 broke co-instability with uglifyjs Guilhem Moulin
• Re: Emacs 1:27.1+1-3~bpo10+1 - Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Domenico Cufalo

Feb 16

• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Harald Dunkel
• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Sudip Mukherjee
• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Thorsten Glaser
• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Sudip Mukherjee
• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Thorsten Glaser
• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Harald Dunkel
• Re: maven 3.6.3, please? Emmanuel Bourg

Feb 19

• Re: zfs 2.0.1 backport to buster Wolfgang Kroener

Feb 23

• Servicio de la flota Alarico Veloz

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]