[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: conditional d/rules resulting in different features b/t buster & stretch-backports?



Hi Alex,

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:26:23PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> On 1/4/19 8:30 AM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > 
> > Alexandre, would you please upload 1.3.5+dfsg-2~bpo+1 now that it's
> > part of buster?  If the ftpmaster for the backports queue is ok [1]
> > with this bpo udeb then this ought to be easy to resolve.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > Nicholas
> > 
> > [1] libzstd will need to pass through the NEW queue for
> >     stretch-backports, because of the new udeb package.
> > 
> 
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> I've uploaded yesterday libzstd 1.3.8 into unstable. Once it is in
> testing I'll upload the backport. Hope that's fine.

Yes, that's fine, and I think you made the right decision waiting to
upload of 1.3.8+dfsg-3~bpo9+1 :-)

Regards,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: