Re: conditional d/rules resulting in different features b/t buster & stretch-backports?
On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 08:36 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 07:57:01AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >But AIUI there is no DI built from backports, nor able to use udebs
> >from backports, so it doesn't matter, does it?
>
> Not *yet*, but Kibi and I have been playing with this for a while.
Cool, I gladly stand corrected ;-)
Will that work be targetting stretch-backports though? (IOW, does
Nicholas need to care about it here and now)
Ian.
Reply to: