On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Dominik George wrote: > > I don't want backports to contain things are are not suited for a > > release. > > That's why we are doing all this. It is NOT about anything to backports. > It is about adding something new that uses the same RULES as backports, > with a slight diversion, and thus can also make use of infrastructure > already there for backports. Neither being economic with manpower and > machines nor trying to be a good neighbour by adhering to the same rules > means to change or add anything to -backports. And I said I think it should start independently to prove its worth the work. And it isn't backports infrastructure. It is ftpmaster's, we are just users. We can't even add anything, even if we want to. The only things we control are the NEW queue of the backports-suites ( a new suite with have its own queue) and the website (which also doesn't fit for the new suite). So imho addressing this as a backports topic is just wrong. Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature