Re: Backport OpenJDK-11 (and remove OpenJDK-9)
Le 24/10/2018 à 09:38, Alexander Wirt a écrit :
>> Ok, sorry I should have checked openjdk-11 first. I'll re-upload
>> openjdk-9 then, followed by openjdk-10 and openjdk-11.
> ehm, no? Why? will users use that? I am not sure if thats useful for
> backports and the users.
>
> Please explain the reasoning for having all openjdks
@Alex I have another proposal: I could upload a single openjdk-11
package but actually containing OpenJDK 9. Once it's built on all
architectures, I would upload an update containing OpenJDK 10, and then
again a last update containing OpenJDK 11.
That way there will be only one JDK package in stretch-backports, and
you won't have to accept and remove two temporary packages.
What do you think?
Emmanuel Bourg
Reply to: