Re: hdparm_9.56+ds-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Mon, 14 May 2018, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/11/2018 06:29 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> > On 05/11/2018 06:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>> I guess I am not in acl list, though some time ago I was able to upload
> >>> libzstd backport. Can I be added back? Or how to proceed in general?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> the first backport of each package needs to be a sponsored backport.
>
> I guess any DD with the uid in backports ACL should be able to do that
> isn't?
> I've opened rt-ticket as described in [0] in order to get included.
>
>
> In general, I'll be thankful if anybody with backports hat on would
> sponsor the upload.
>
> The main reason for the backport is annoying bug #891051 and the changes
> between the version in stretch and testing include mostly bugfixes.
> So in my humble opinion hdparm is a perfect candidate for
> stretch-backports especially due to it's wide use.
Bug fixes are never a reason for a backports. Backports is about features,
not bugs.
Alex
Reply to: