Re: xchat_2.8.8-11~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> >I don't see a reason for that backport. The version is still the same
> >as in stable. Could you please expain the reason for uploading this
> >backport?
>
>
> rmadison -u debian xchat
> xchat | 2.8.8-7.1 | oldoldstable | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
> xchat | 2.8.8-7.3 | oldstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
> xchat | 2.8.8-7.3 | oldstable-kfreebsd | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
> xchat | 2.8.8-11 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> xchat | 2.8.8-11 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
> xchat | 2.8.8-11 | unstable-debug | source
>
>
> no xchat in stable is the reason for users asking me to backport it :)
>
> I'm reuploading it!
no, that doesn't answer my question. I am talking about upstream and
backports is about upstream versions.
Alex
Reply to: