[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xchat_2.8.8-11~bpo9+1_amd64.changes REJECTED



On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

> Hello Alex,
> 
> >I don't see a reason for that backport. The version is still the same
> >as in stable. Could you please expain the reason for uploading this
> >backport?
> 
> 
> rmadison -u debian xchat
> xchat      | 2.8.8-7.1     | oldoldstable       | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
> xchat      | 2.8.8-7.3     | oldstable          | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
> xchat      | 2.8.8-7.3     | oldstable-kfreebsd | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
> xchat      | 2.8.8-11      | testing            | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> xchat      | 2.8.8-11      | unstable           | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
> xchat      | 2.8.8-11      | unstable-debug     | source
> 
> 
> no xchat in stable is the reason for users asking me to backport it :)
> 
> I'm reuploading it!
no, that doesn't answer my question. I am talking about upstream and
backports is about upstream versions. 

Alex


Reply to: