Hello Uwe, On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 23:27:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > On 08/05/2017 10:35 PM, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > > Please reject ofxstatement from backports-new. > > > > I think I should not upload it to backports since it could be > > installed to stable from testing without any problem. > > This isn't a reason to not put it into backports (AFAIU). Consider you > add testing sources to a stable system and install > ofxstatement from testing. Then if the next ofxstatement isn't > installable on stable (because it depends on a newer libc say) the > stable user runs into a conflict. I mean that ofxstatemnt should be installable in future cause it's python app. There is another point, that most people have stable+backports in sources.list, not stable+backports+testing+sid, so even if package could be installed from testing, some users will have problems with this. OK, since you (or Alexander?) accepted the package, I will support it in backports, that's not a problem for me. -- Best regards, Alexander Gerasiov Contacts: e-mail: gq@cs.msu.su Homepage: http://gerasiov.net Skype: gerasiov PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49 BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1
Attachment:
pgp9tGY780dwr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature