On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 06:47:30PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > On 07/12/2017 12:32 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >All backporters have a responsibility to maintain their backports with > >updates from codename+1 until codename+2 is released, but IIRC they > >become the LTS Team's responsibility when old-stable becomes > >old-old-stable. > > No, I wouldn't expect that. Eh? wheezy7-bpos must be updated from jessie8 until stretch9 is released jessie8-bpos must be update from stretch9 until buster10 is released On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:40:02PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > No, I wouldn't expect that. > LTS Team is not involved in backports. And old-old-stable backports doesn't > exist. I swear I read a thread about how the expectation is that a backporter is not responsible for continuing to maintain his/her bpos in the part of the LTS lifecycle after +2 is released...but how the LTS team would if they felt the bpo was important. Maybe I missed the end of that discussion? Was it resolved that backports become unmaintained when old-stable becomes old-old-stable? Cheers, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature