[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Bug with ZFS-DKMS



Hi,

 

and thanks.

 

This finally breaks my plans, because in the

jessie-backports is 5.1.8-dfsg-6~bpo8+2

:-(

So, this means for me to continue with kernel 3.16

 

Thanks,

Manfred

 

 

From: Gianfranco Costamagna [mailto:locutusofborg@debian.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2016 11:25 PM
To: webman@manfbraun.de; 'Al Nikolov'
Cc: debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Bug with ZFS-DKMS

 

Hi

 

Speaking with vbox hat on.

 

5.1.12 should work correctly with 4.8

(Probably also 5.1.10 but I don't remember now)

 

Cheers

 

G.

(Sorry for top posting)

 

 

On Sun, 25 Dec, 2016 at 22:48, webman@manfbraun.de

Hi !

Thanks for your reply - yes I understand this.

Probably one part of the problem is, that kernel
versions disappear from backports ... I saw 4.6
some time ago - but this will not explain the
"missing headers problem".

A little more tolerance to this. Even if I would
succeed with 4.8, I have to verify, that Virtualbox
can work with it - which was (ok, some time ago)
limited to 4.5

Thanks anyway and a nice time,
Manfred


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Nikolov [mailto:clown@debian.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2016 10:32 PM
> To: webman@manfbraun.de
> Cc: debian-backports@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug with ZFS-DKMS
>
> В Вс, 25/12/2016 в 20:34 +0100, webman@manfbraun.de пишет:
>
> > On the ZOL mailinglist, I got the info, that building
> > the packages works using kernel 4.7
> > Do not know, how they made this, because in the
> > jessie-backport, there are no headers for 4.7 !!
> > Just to make it complete, I reinstalled from scratch
> > with kernel 3.16 and zfs-dkms from jessie-backports
> > and everything is ok.
> >
> > I came to kernel 4.8 due to other reasons and
> > now, I am stuck. Will see, what to do or how to
> > proceed.
>
> See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847018
>
> That's exactly your issue with linux 4.8. The update is still too young
> though to be backported.


Reply to: