Re: libbpp-seq_2.2.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Tue, 17 May 2016 at 15:51:05 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I would expect it to follow unstable. I guess the rename had a reason.
>
> AFAIK the renaming is positively harmful when done in backports.
Confirming what Thorsten said: anything compiled with jessie's std::string
ABI must not have the v5 suffix, and I can't see why a backport would
be built with stretch's std::string ABI (that would defeat the purpose
of backports).
S
Reply to: