On Sat, 16 Apr 2016, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:30 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:22 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > > > You - or better more than one person - promise to support this kernel for > > > at least stable and (later) oldstable. Preferably later jessie-lts. > > > Supporting means the usual thing frequent uploads and so on. > > Yes, I do intend to keep it working for the lifetime of Jessie (not sure for > > jessie-lts, although new kernel on old userland is usually easier than the > > opposite). I'd also be interested by someone else stepping in for > > maintainership so I'm not the only one on board, but right now nobody really > > voiced her intention. > > > > > > > > > Is that something you can live with? > > Yes. > > Hi, > > With that in mind, what's the status on this? I didn't take the above mail as > an ACK for for upload to jessie-backport, but maybe it was actually one? It was an ACK. > I've uploaded a new kernel to sid just yesterday and I intend to wait until a > new upload become a testing candidate (even if it won't migrate because of the > enforced RC bug) before considering an upload. Thats good and should be the preferred practise, you are free to upload grsec to bpo, as soon as it would migrate under normalen circumstances (without the RC bug). Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature