[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Clarification about the "Uploaders" field



Hi Tiago,

On Samstag, 20. Februar 2016, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> There's something on the backporting guidelines that is not very clear
> and makes anyone ask me why I'm doing this whenever I ask for a
> sponsorship of a backport. The "Basic Rules"[1] section states the
> following:
> 
> "Do not do any changes to the package beside of backporting stuff."
> 
> But the "Uploaders" subsection of "Best Practice" suggests[2] that if
> add yourself to the "Uploaders" field, it becomes easier to follow the
> packages though DDPO.
> 
> To me, this changes looks completely related to the backport itself,
> but for some people this may look like a package hijack.
> 
> Can we update the guidelines to make this a little bit more clear?
> Stating if one is supposed to do this or not?

adding oneself to the Uploaders: field when doing backports is a well 
established practice (though not mandatory), in so far I think providing a 
patch to the website making this clear would be appreciated.

The source code for the website lives at 
https://github.com/formorer/backports.debian.org


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: