[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bcache-tools in jessie-backports?



2015-09-16 14:09 GMT+02:00 Robie Basak <robie@justgohome.co.uk>:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:41:17AM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>> Do you plan to upload bcache-tools in jessie-backports?
>>
>> If not, are you OK if I do?
>
> I have no plans, and have no issues if you want to drive this. David?
>
> If it helps, we (Ubuntu) backported bcache-tools 1.0.7-1 to Ubuntu
> Trusty in a no change backport. I'm not aware of any issues, though
> there is
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcache-tools/+bug/1462466

I have prepared a simple rebuild (see attached diff).

Just waiting your ACk to upload it.

For reference, lintian complains about:
I: bcache-tools changes: backports-changes-missing
W: bcache-tools source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: bcache-tools source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.8-2~bpo8+1
W: bcache-tools source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.5 (current is 3.9.6)
P: bcache-tools source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
P: bcache-tools: no-upstream-changelog
W: bcache-tools: command-with-path-in-maintainer-script postinst:6
/usr/sbin/update-initramfs
W: bcache-tools: maintainer-script-ignores-errors preinst

Regards

-- 
Mathieu Parent
From 3fd20d5771aea81105d50eef48d14e782edfd588 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Parent <math.parent@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:18:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] 1.0.8-2~bpo8+1: Rebuild for jessie-backports

---
 debian/changelog | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 93bfc63..7896510 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+bcache-tools (1.0.8-2~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
+
+  * Rebuild for jessie-backports.
+
+ -- Mathieu Parent <sathieu@debian.org>  Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:18:39 +0200
+
 bcache-tools (1.0.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Only run update-initramfs if installed. Fix dracut. (Closes: #788442)
-- 
2.5.1


Reply to: