[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted git 1:1.9.1-1~bpo70+2 (source amd64 all)



I didn't backport anything just checked the version available in the repos :P

Not the developer you are looking for.

- Nick

On 06/16/2015 10:16 AM, Jan Wagner wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Nick,

Am 15.06.15 um 20:04 schrieb Nick T.:
Oh, totally misread the original email, I thought you meant if it
will be fixed in jessie.

I don't have a clue about wheezy.

Okay ... let`s try again. :-)

You backported git 1:1.9.1-1 to wheezy-backports. Could you backport
the version 1:2.1.4-2.1 from jessie to wheezy-backports again? This
will also fix CVE-2014-9390 in wheezy-backports.
As far as I can see you modified the actual version in
wheezy-backports. So this seems not just a straight rebuild.

Thanks, Jan.
- --
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V-
PS PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=vIcX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: