Hi Paul / Bruno On 31/05/2015 13:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
As main maintainer of doublecmd, what do you think? Shall I sponsor this with the Debian maintainers consent?
I haven't reviewed Bruno's packaging yet, but I have no objections if you have and are happy to sponsor it.
On 25-05-15 18:40, bruno zanetti wrote:I'd be pleased to share a backport I made of doublecmd from jessie (0.5.11-1) to wheezy. The only change I made (in debian/control) was to force use of fp >= 2.6.4 and lcl >= 1.2 from wheezy-backports to avoid FTBFS.
I think it would be better to backport 0.6.2-1 as upstream's changelog [1] shows a long list of fixes since 0.5.11-1. I'm not familiar with the backporting process, but I think this should be possible.
Instead of forcing the use of fpc >= 2.6.4 and lcl >= 1.2, another way of avoiding the FTBFS is to leave the build-depends on fpc and lcl as they are and additionally build-depend on lazarus-src. I am thinking of using this method for backporting doublecmd to Ubuntu Trusty. I don't know which method is better suited for Debian backports.
Regards Graham [1] http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/mantisbt/changelog_page.php