Re: phantomjs backport
According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/phantomjs.html, it's not considered for migration to testing due to some grave or serious bugs. Until those are resolved, it's unlikely that it could be considered for backports either. Especially since the bugs include a ftbfs on at least one platform.
Pierre Rudloff <contact@rudloff.pro> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I would be interested in a backport of phantomjs but it is only
>available in unstable and not in testing. Is there anything we can do or
>should I just wait for it to be in testing?
>Note that the package in unstable seems to build and work correctly on
>Wheezy.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-backports-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>Archive: [🔎] 535000A3.6010606@rudloff.pro">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 535000A3.6010606@rudloff.pro
>
Reply to: