Re: 0ad backport, asking for review and upload
>> How about backporting nvidia-texture-tools or disabling one or few
>> tests which causes FTBFS of 0ad package? First variant is
>> preferable, because armel and armhf build support was added only in
>> nvidia-texture-tools 2.0.8-1+dfsg-4.
>
> I contacted the maintainer of nvidia-texture-tools and it is ok for
> him if I make a backport, as I did [1]. The rebuild required no
> changes and I tested it briefly on a Wheezy installation.
Ok. Uploaded.
> Boris, could you review also this package or do you prefer differently?
All is fine. But do not forget to attach a debdiff next time please.
Even if only debian/changelog is changed.
> If it's good, I'll rebuild 0ad with the strict dependency on the
> latest nvidia-texture-tools.
Yes, do it please.
Best regards,
Boris
Reply to: