Re: task_2.2.0-3~bpo70+1_i386.changes REJECTED
Ah, scratch that. I misread the statement. You refer to missing
changelog entries. Will fix and re-upload.
On 16/08/13 07:05 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> I was following:
>
> http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/
>
> which says:
>
> Use "squeeze-backports", "squeeze-backports-sloppy" or
> "wheezy-backports" as distribution, neither "stable" nor "unstable".
>
> and debian/changelog has:
>
> task (2.2.0-3~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low
>
> * Rebuild for wheezy.
>
> -- Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> Wed, 31 Jul 2013
> 12:45:41 -0300
>
>
> Did I not understand the instructions? Was I following the wrong
> instructions?
>
> Confused,
> Ben
>
>
> On 16/08/13 07:00 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>>
>> Changes since stable missing in changes file. See contribution docs for details.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>> concerns.
>>
>
Reply to: