Re: Question about package qxmpp/0.7.6-1~bpo70+1
It means everybody should be added to a whitelist
manually?
I have sponsored this package yesterday, but did no receive
any rejection-emails on that.
Cheers,
Anton
2013/5/28 Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>:
> Boris Pek schrieb am Tuesday, den 28. May 2013:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > cat qxmpp_0.7.6-1\~bpo70+1_amd64.changes.reason
>> > From: Alexander Wirt <backports-team@debian.org>
>> >
>> > Changes since stable missing in changes file. Please see contributions
>> > documents for details.
>> >
>> > It was rejected last time and it was rejected this time for the same reason.
>>
>> Ok, now we see that option "-v0.4.92-1" was forgotten. But it was not obvious.
>> Is it possible to send such notifications to email?
> This is done, but unfortunatly a whitelist is needed for that feature and not
> every address used in Changed-By is in this list. You should have received a
> mail for the second reject, I added you to the whitelist before.
>
> Alex
> --
> Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de
> CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-backports-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20130528072946.GD23148@hawking.credativ.lan">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20130528072946.GD23148@hawking.credativ.lan
>
Reply to: