Hi, On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Bastian Blank wrote: > > It's also probably not a good habit to get into either even if it happens > > to work in isolated cases. I also prefer to use stable backports on a stable system then apt-pinning and packages from testing. So also thanks from me to everyone maintaining backports in Debian backports! > > squeeze-backports is much safer. > And lacking security support, sure. If that's happening, the maintainer is using backports wrongly, squeeze is still supported. But I agree, the Debian security team should formally care for backports too. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.