On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:23:16 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> So i'm considering backporting python-babel to squeeze-backports, unless
> there are any objections. It seems to work fine for me, fwiw.
>
> Is there any reason i should hesitate to upload python-babel
> 0.9.6-1~bpo1 to squeeze-backports in preparation for the fix to #644401?
having heard nothing, i'm going ahead with the python-babel upload to
squeeze-backports.
--dkg
Attachment:
pgpN9I0prvX8y.pgp
Description: PGP signature