On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:23:16 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > So i'm considering backporting python-babel to squeeze-backports, unless > there are any objections. It seems to work fine for me, fwiw. > > Is there any reason i should hesitate to upload python-babel > 0.9.6-1~bpo1 to squeeze-backports in preparation for the fix to #644401? having heard nothing, i'm going ahead with the python-babel upload to squeeze-backports. --dkg
Attachment:
pgpN9I0prvX8y.pgp
Description: PGP signature