Re: Debian Backports are inconsistent - any ideas ?

[Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>]

Ben Armstrong schrieb am Mittwoch, den 01. Februar 2012:

> On 02/01/2012 10:37 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >And as usually there will be people that just don't read, but also complain
> >afterwards :).
> 
> Which may be exacerbated by the particular way this factoid is
> worded in the dpkg bot on irc:
> 
> 
> 10:52 <dpkg> backports.debian.org (formerly backports.org) is an
>              official repository of <backports> for the current stable
>              distribution, prepared by Debian developers.  Read
>              http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ to enable and
>              use.  See also <bdo kernel> <bdo mirrors> <bdo contents>
>              <bdo list> <bdo bugs> <bdo pinning> <bdo key>
>              <backports-sloppy> <bdo xorg>.
>              http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20100905
> 
> Users will be directed to the /Instructions/ page which does not
> include the new caveat. Maybe the caveat should be repeated on this
> page and/or mentioned in the factoid (though that factoid is getting
> a bit crowded).
I updated the instructions page.

Thanks for the hint

Alex
-- 
Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de 
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA  B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A