Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport
micah anderson schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
> > > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> > > > >> cpufrequtils (007-2)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure,
> > > > >> that there are only stable packages installed. I reverted the compiler
> > > > >> back to gcc 4.4. Cpufrequtils is needed for newer kernels to have the
> > > > >> cpufreq modules work properly.
> > > > >
> > > > > I had forgotten that. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > I have found linux-2.6 in the bpo upload Q today. Thanks for this.
> > > > Please keep cpufrequtils-007-2 for kernels >= 3.0 in mind.
> > btw. regarding CVE-2012-0056 - feel free to upload after the fix hits
> > unstable.
>
> I believe that 2.6.39 left unstable some time ago, to be replaced by
> 3.x, so I'm not sure how that will work exacty?
we have 3.x in bpo since today.
Alex
--
Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
Reply to: