Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> (07/01/2011): > This is kind of an important architecture, so it would be nice to > not have it lag behind so far (it just caused > http://bugs.debian.org/609277 to occur - while it's nice to catch > such bugs, the fact that the build failed is a concern to me). Does > the build just need to be requeued? No, a missing or laggy build doesn't *cause* FTBFS. Point out, or reveal an insufficient version in a build-dep, rather. Requeuing is cheap, given back. Please note that you want to talk to the buildd admins for such issues (Cc'd). KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature